This is a broad response to the terrorist attacks in Sweden, the United Kingdom, Spain and Finland. Alliance of Former Muslims (Ireland) exists to empower ex-Muslims and to increase awareness among non-Muslims of the religious fascists in our midst. By identifying Islamic terror as an anti-Enlightenment movement, we hope to restore the confidence needed for ordinary Irish people to take direct action.
Religion is a very ancient phenomenon. Among psychologists and social scientists, there is a consensus that it once served a useful purpose among our ancestors, e.g. in terms of social cohesion. Today, however, it can be well-argued that religion is the single greatest impediment to our species’ well-being. This is not difficult to understand, given the sectarian divisions that fuel so much of the death and destruction around us. Indeed, it is estimated that over a million Muslims and Hindus died during the partition of India – a clear-cut example of separation along religious lines. Like the human appendix, it would be foolish to take the usefulness of religion for granted simply because it continues to exist. To quote Sam Harris in this regard:
As a biological phenomenon, religion is the product of cognitive processes that have deep roots in our evolutionary past. Some researchers have speculated that religion itself may have played an important role in getting large groups of prehistoric humans to socially cohere. If this is true, we can say that religion has served an important purpose. This does not suggest, however, that it serves an important purpose now. There is, after all, nothing more natural than rape. But no one would argue that rape is good, or compatible with a civil society, because it may have had evolutionary advantages for our ancestors. That religion may have served some necessary function for us in the past does not preclude the possibility that it is now the greatest impediment to our building a global civilisation.
This is especially the case when it comes to Islam, unquestionably the most harmful religion of our day. Our planet is now home to approximately 1.6 billion Muslims, a great many of whom firmly believe that in the near future, you and I will either convert to Islam, live under the rule of a Caliphate, or be executed for our non-belief. That such an infantile mindset should be propped up by the votaries of ‘diversity’ is so absurd, we believe, that it belongs in a dystopian novel. To quote A.C. Grayling in this regard:
Getting a hearing on condition of giving others a hearing, compromising, accepting that some of one’s desiderata are not going to happen, or not yet, are all marks of grown-up citizenship of the world. Islam is a religion that has a too-ready tendency to infantilise its votaries – the more eager they are, the more unreflective and doctrinaire the pieties substituting for their rationality and maturity, as one sees in the childishly angry demonstrations, inflamed by demagogues, against Danish cartoonists, Salman Rushdie, and the like.
As it stands, Islam is the fastest growing religion in Europe. This is largely due to the birth rate among European Muslims being three times that of their non-Muslim neighbours. This is a serious problem, for no matter where you go in Europe, Muslims demand unconditional tolerance and respect for their violent beliefs. Indeed, this notion of mainstream Islam being a “religion of peace hijacked by fundamentalists” is a ludicrous flight of the imagination. The belief that non-Muslims deserve to burn in hell, that atheists and apostates deserve to be killed, that pre-marital sex warrants being stoned to death, that thieves should have their hands and feet cut off, that homosexuality is punishable by hanging – all of these are staples of orthodox Islamic thought, not extremist ideology.
Here is the reality: Islam is an inherently imperial religion. It strives to be the dominant political and spiritual force on the planet, as a rudimentary analysis of history testifies to. This imperial disposition creates a natural resentment among Muslims who have to live under non-Muslim (kafir) rule. This resentment is what leads many Muslim migrants to isolate themselves from the host population, which, when combined with deprivation, creates Muslim ghettos. When the collective indignation of these ghettos is such that it enables Wahhabi-Salafi preachers to assume the role of community leaders, this is when they become safe havens for terrorism, with some even being described as ‘no-go zones’. To quote Dr. Tawfik Hamid on the nature of these zones:
No-go zones are a very significant and serious problem, especially after the recent rush of refugees to Europe from Syria and other parts of the Muslim world. They are bringing a culture that is very different from the traditional Western culture, and with these numbers it is a very serious issue… [No-go zones] are a significant threat when you consider the high birth-rate of the Muslim community. Some of the Islamic groups encourage this because they know the more numbers they have in Western countries, the more influential they can be… It’s like when you see a cancer cell that is not causing any harm now, but later on, if it is left without intervention, it can cause very serious trouble. Even if you don’t see the trouble today, it does not mean that trouble is not coming.
Alliance of Former Muslims (Ireland) believes that any coordinated response to terrorism must include the dissolution of Muslim ghettos and no-go zones, with the population being dispersed more widely. It is also essential that we shut down Wahhabi-Salafi mosques and schools, with their clerics and teachers being deported without delay. If these basic steps are not followed, then there is no reason to expect these attacks to abate. Ireland is not immune to the plague of Islamic terror: indeed, we now know that one of the London attackers lived in Rathmines for two years. To quote Chris Phillips, former head of the National Counter-Terrorism Security Office (UK):
Ireland is making the same mistakes that were made by France, Germany and Belgium more than ten years ago. They’re dismissing the threat of radical Islamic terrorism as someone else’s problem… It isn’t enough to pretend that these attacks wouldn’t happen here. A soft target is a soft target. That’s what these groups are looking for. It’s about making a statement.
The burning of the Swedish flag in a Muslim ghetto.